Learn AI Health Articles Mental Health & Wellness Sleep Health

Sleep health study download

By:Owen Views:514

The first is a public medical academic database with a peer-review logo, the second is the official public database of domestic and foreign sleep research industry associations, and the third is a desensitized data set open to sleep laboratories of universities/scientific research institutions; all scattered online studies without ethical review numbers, clear sample sizes and control groups, no matter how eye-catching the title is, are not recommended for downloading and use. More than 90% have problems with outdated data, one-sided conclusions, and even tampering by commercial funders.

Sleep health study download

I ran into a lot of pitfalls two years ago when I helped the community with sleep intervention projects for middle-aged and elderly people. At that time, I searched the "100 Global Sleep Research Collections" on the Internet to save trouble. There was a sleep duration standard for the elderly called the "latest release of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine". It said that 5 hours of sleep a day is enough for those over 60 years old. We I did 3 science popularization sessions and was later pointed out by a retired physician. That was the old standard in 2015. In 2021, it was updated to 6-7 hours. The sample size was also expanded from the original 3,000 people to 27,000 people. At that time, my face was burning when I stood on the stage. When I came back, I deleted all the piles of unsourced information.

If you are looking for research for clinical reference or academic papers, go directly to PubMed, Web of Just search for sleep-related partitioned literature in Science. If your organization has an institutional account, most of them can be downloaded for free. If not, ask a friend who is a medical student to help. It can only be used for a glass of iced American at most. There is no need to buy a packaged literature library like Xubao that costs tens of dollars. I bought it once before, half of which were duplicates, and many of them were first drafts of undergraduate thesis, without peer review comments. If you are doing popular science or research and development of civilian sleep products, you don’t need to study such obscure basic medical research. It is enough to go to the official websites of the Chinese Sleep Research Association and the European Sleep Research Association to find the white papers and industry research data they release every year. These are all publicly available for free download. The sample data were divided into different age groups, occupations, and regions. Last year, I did a user survey on sleep monitoring products for Internet practitioners. I directly used the programmer sleep data from the China Sleep Research Association in 2023 as a control group, which saved me almost 3 months of offline sampling time. It was very delicious.

By the way, there are actually two directions of debate in the field of sleep research that have never stopped. When looking for information, you can choose according to your needs. One school is the behavioral cognitive school, which believes that most sleep disorders do not require medication and can be improved by adjusting work and rest, sleep environment, and cognitive habits. This is the CBT-I sleep cognitive behavioral intervention that everyone often hears. Most of their research is more focused on practical intervention, which can also be understood by ordinary users. This part of the public resources of the European Sleep Research Association has the most content, and it also comes with many directly usable intervention plan templates, which can be downloaded and used. The other school is the neuroscience school, which believes that long-term chronic sleep disorders are strongly related to abnormalities in brain neurotransmitters and the central system, and must be combined with drugs or physical intervention. Most of these studies are included in specialist journals such as "Nature Sleep" and "Sleep Medicine Reviews". They have high clinical reference value, but the threshold is also high for non-professionals. If you don't have a medical background, you will probably not be able to understand it even if you download it. There is no need to join in the fun.

There is another detail that is easily overlooked. When downloading sleep studies involving human experiments, be sure to check whether there is an ethics review number first. Especially for studies that test the effects of sleep aid products and intervention programs, if there is not even a stamp number from the ethics committee of the affiliated institution, don't use it no matter how good-looking the conclusion is. I once saw a time management blogger while watching short videos. He used a study on "4 hours of sleep a day is enough to support efficient work" as an argument. Later it was found out that the study was funded by a functional beverage manufacturer. The sample size was only 12 people, all of whom were professional endurance athletes. They are inherently more durable than ordinary people. The conclusion is not universal at all, and it has troubled many office workers who have to stay up late.

If you are looking for relatively detailed research, such as sleep disorders related to rare diseases or sleep intervention programs for special occupations such as astronauts, and you cannot find them in the public database, you can look through the public sharing of professional bloggers who do sleep science popularization. Many bloggers who work in hospital sleep centers and university laboratories will put their own research packages in the niche areas in the comment area or fan groups. They are all screened genuine resources, which is much more efficient than searching aimlessly by yourself. Oh, by the way, remember to mark the source link and release time after downloading, otherwise you will not be able to find the traceability basis when you write the plan and do science popularization, and you will really have a headache when you rework.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is sourced from the Internet. All content represents the author's personal views only and does not reflect the stance of this website. The author shall be solely responsible for the content.

2. Part of the content on this website is compiled from the Internet. This website shall not be liable for any civil disputes, administrative penalties, or other losses arising from improper reprinting or citation.

3. If there is any infringing content or inappropriate material, please contact us to remove it immediately. Contact us at: